Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 11:06
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Why do diabetic people sweat so much?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Do foreign workers face discrimination in Canada?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Salary you need to live comfortably in Virginia in 2025, according to new study - 13newsnow.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Capivasertib given to breast cancer patients in Wales for first time - BBC
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years: